(Dedicated
to those people who lost their lives and properties on the 3rd
& 4th October 2023)
MK
SUBBA
42
Glacial Lakes (GLs) are located in Sikkim out of the 100 GLs that have been identified
in the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR), with Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh
having 15 each followed by Himachal Pradesh (10) and Arunachal Pradesh and
Uttarakhand having 9 each. The 42 GLs located within Sikkim are as
shown in the figure 1 below.
Decoding and
reading the map of Sikkim figure 1 with the available data inputs as tabulated
in figure 2 gives deeper insights and a
clear view of the geographical location of these 42 GLs and their current
status.
Figure 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Index |
LAKE UID/ID |
ELEVATION |
WATER SPREAD AREA(Ha) |
WATER |
SPREAD |
AREA(Ha) |
REMARKS |
||
|
|
(mtrs) |
BASE 2009 |
BASE2011 |
2 yr./5yr.
Average |
10 years Average |
2024 sept |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
1 |
07478A090355 |
5161 |
- |
- |
58.7(2yr) |
- |
62.0 |
very high
risk |
||
2 |
07478A090403 |
4827 |
- |
- |
6.8(2YR) |
- |
8.0 |
very high risk |
||
3 |
07478A090425 |
5118 |
- |
- |
5.9(2yr) |
- |
6.0 |
very high
risk |
||
4 |
07478A010059 |
5194 |
136.0 |
123.0 |
152.0(5yr) |
130.0 |
136.0 |
very high
risk |
||
5 |
07477D120034 |
5238 |
106.0 |
106.0 |
120.0(5yr) |
111.0 |
120.0 |
very high
rsk |
||
6 |
07477D120030 |
5209 |
- |
88.0 |
10.0(5yr) |
86.0 |
110.0 |
very high
risk |
||
7 |
07478A130523 |
5303 |
- |
156.0 |
185.0(5yr) |
254.0 |
184.0 |
very high
risk |
||
8 |
07478A050213 |
5034 |
54.0 |
55.0 |
62.0(5yr) |
58.0 |
65.0 |
------- |
||
9 |
04748A010058 |
5441 |
63.0 |
67.0 |
88.0(5yr) |
79.0 |
79.0 |
----------- |
||
10 |
07478A050272 |
5414 |
- |
56.0 |
78.0(5yr) |
56.0 |
95.0 |
----------- |
||
11 |
07477D120025 |
5073 |
- |
22.0 |
22.8(2yr) |
- |
26.0 |
Vy hgh rsk |
||
12 |
07478A090358 |
4917 |
- |
22.0 |
36.5(2yr) |
- |
35.0 |
very high risk |
||
13 |
07478A050186 |
5185 |
- |
11.0 |
8.9(2yr) |
- |
13.0 |
----- |
||
14 |
07478A020131 |
4860 |
- |
33.0 |
33.7(2yr) |
- |
41.0 |
very high risk |
||
15 |
07478A050208 |
4949 |
44.16 |
|
|
|
||||
16 |
07478A130519 |
5209 |
- |
- |
7.1(2yr) |
- |
9.0 |
very low risk |
||
17 |
07478A130553 |
5232 |
- |
- |
39.6(2yr) |
- |
42.0 |
medium risk |
||
18 |
07478A100485 |
4491 |
- |
- |
6.9(2yr) |
- |
9.0 |
very low risk |
||
19 |
07478A130576 |
5051 |
- |
- |
6.9(2yr) |
- |
9.0 |
medium risk |
||
20 |
07477D120039 |
5424 |
- |
- |
28.5(2yr) |
- |
33.0 |
medium risk |
||
21 |
07478A100486 |
4207 |
- |
- |
7.4(2yr) |
- |
9.0 |
very high risk |
||
22 |
07477D120019 |
5148 |
- |
104.0 |
107.0(5yr) |
95.0 |
104.0 |
------------ |
||
23 |
07477D120032 |
4998 |
- |
24.0 |
23.2(2yr) |
- |
29.0 |
very high risk |
||
24 |
07478A050193 |
4974 |
- |
11.0 |
12.3(2yr) |
- |
14.0 |
----------- |
||
25 |
07478A090373 |
4964 |
- |
17.0 |
16.8(2yr) |
- |
19.0 |
very high risk |
||
26 |
07478A100495 |
4525 |
- |
33.0 |
26.7(2yr) |
- |
33.0 |
------------- |
||
27 |
07478A020123 |
4710 |
- |
11.0 |
11.1(2yr) |
- |
11.0 |
--------- |
||
28 |
0747A030158 |
4280 |
- |
14.0 |
14.0(2yr) |
-- |
14.0 |
---------- |
||
29 |
07478A050211 |
5049 |
- |
36.0 |
32.7(2yr) |
- |
37.0 |
------------ |
||
30 |
07478A130550 |
5118 |
- |
26.0 |
26.0(2yr) |
- |
27.0 |
------------- |
||
31 |
07478A010063 |
5496 |
- |
19.0 |
25.8(2yr) |
- |
29.0 |
-------- |
||
32 |
07478A050249 |
5149 |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
---------- |
||
33 |
07476A090447 |
4603 |
- |
- |
13.5(2yr) |
- |
14.0 |
high risk |
||
34 |
07477D120035 |
5550 |
- |
- |
3.5(2yr) |
- |
4.0 |
medium risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Index |
LAKE UID/ID |
ELEVATION |
WATER SPREAD AREA(Ha) |
WATER |
SPREAD |
AREA(Ha) |
REMARKS |
||
|
|
(mtrs) |
BASE 2009 |
BASE2011 |
2 yr./5yr.
Average |
10 years Average |
2024 sept |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
35 |
07478A090383 |
5030 |
- |
- |
2.0(2yr) |
- |
3.0 |
very high risk |
||
36 |
07478A090412 |
5084 |
- |
- |
17.2(2yr) |
- |
17.0 |
medium risk |
||
37 |
07477D080005 |
5023 |
46.0 |
46.0 |
41.0(5yr) |
42.0 |
42.0 |
-------- |
||
38 |
07478A090361 |
4960 |
58.0 |
58.0 |
57.0(5yr) |
68.0 |
58.0 |
very high risk |
||
39 |
07478A050208 |
4989 |
- |
44.0 |
16.2(2yr) |
- |
19.0 |
------- |
||
40 |
07478A130563 |
4962 |
- |
12.0 |
8.4(2yr) |
- |
11.0 |
medium risk |
||
41 |
07478A010062 |
5433 |
- |
14.0 |
10.5(2yr) |
- |
9.0 |
------- |
||
|
42 |
07478A130571 |
4781 |
- |
15.0 |
11.5(2yr) |
= |
13.0 |
very high risk |
Earlier,
the Glacial Lakes were coded with Sikkim state specific codes such as (SK) but
now they are denoted with individual twelve digit numbers as columned in LAKE
UID/ID above. Out of the 42 GLs only
three are located in West district, indexed as 14 (Tikip Chu), categorized as a
very high risk GL, 27 (Bhale Pokhari) and 28 (Lachmi Pokhari), rest all the
thirty nine GLs are located in North Sikkim with sixteen GLs categorized as
very high risk. The South Lhonak Lake is indexed as 4, and still in the very high-risk
level, and close to it is the Green Lake indexed as 31 and the Gurudongmar Lake
has been indexed as 22. Most of these GLs are located above 4000m altitude in the trans boundary area along the Line of
Actual Control with China in the Tibetan Autonomous Region. Lake no 15 and 39
are coded with one single UID/ID
(07478A050208).
Although
revered and worshipped, these Glacial Lakes were primarily viewed in Sikkim as tourist destination, but all that has
changed post what Sikkim and the rest of the world witnessed on the 3rd
and 4th of October 2023, the destruction and mayhem the Glacial Lake
Outburst Floods (GLOF) from the South Lhonak Lake have caused to lives, property and the
environment, which Sikkim has fully not recovered and may take years to rebuilt
and re-strength live and livelihoods hit by the flash floods of that fateful
night.
Well,
the truth is what fury death and destruction we witnessed on the 3rd
and 4th of October 2023 is a serious warning for reaching some
definitive policy decision and wide spread public awareness, if Sikkim is to
avert and prepare for what we are now exposed to the 42 Glacial Lakes in our
surrounding, that too with 17 of them in the very high risk level, as much of
the related information are not easily
available in the public domain. These GLs and Water Bodies (WB) located in the Indian
Himalayan Region (IHR) covering a geographical area of 5.3 lakh kilometer square
and extending over 2500 km in length are the ticking water bombs ready to
explode any time due the vagaries of geological
factors especially the climate change accelerating the melting of the
glaciers, which Sikkim is home to some 320 odd glaciers that feed these water
bodies.
Advance
research shows that around 15 million population of China, Pakistan, India and
Peru are exposed to high risk of GLOFs.
In India 4% of its population lives in the foothills of the mighty Himalayas.
The Himalayas, called the third pole, home to the highest number of glaciers
and snow covered area apart from the Arctic and the Antarctic circles being the
other poles, is the source and origin of the Indus, Ganga and Brahmaputra, that
forms the important river basins system in India effecting and supporting lives
and livelihoods across many states in India. The Himalayas is one of the most
geologically active regions of our planet as nearly 15% of earthquakes, with
magnitude more than 8 on the Richter
scale have hit the Himalayas so far, most importantly, it is the home to
numerous glaciers- the source of fresh water on which millions of people depend
downstream. It is also the prone to natural calamities due to its fragility and
more due to the impact of the climate change causing landslide induced flashfloods,
cloudburst and GLOFs. The figure 1 and
figure 3 below shows the satellite remote sensing images cum mapping of the GLs and WBs, which started
in 2009 taken as the base year as these lakes are located in remote hostile
terrain which are inaccessible where the hands on approach is not possible,
hence its surveillance depends on the state of the art latest remote sensing
satellite technology, which India has been adopting through the National Remote
Sensing Centre, Hyderabad.
The
figure 3 shows the locations and positions of the Glacial Lakes and Water Bodies in the Indian Himalayan Region
from Arunachal Pradesh in the east through Bhutan, Sikkim, Nepal, Uttarakhand,
Himachal Pradesh till Jammu and Kashmir in the North even covering the Tibetan
Autonomous Region of China which forms the river basins of Brahmaputra, Ganga
and the Indus from where the rivers
flowing into India originates. Each of these GLs and WBs are coded with state
specific individual Lake IDs cum UIDs to follow the progress of the increase or
decrease of the water spread area calculated as the difference between the current
water spread area of the lake and the
base year (2009 & 2011) and even the average area covered by these lakes in
the last 2 years, 5 years and 10 years too. In the year 2009 extending upto
2011, the government of India then started to create the inventory list and
started monitoring of the GLs and WBs
having water spread area more than 10 hectare thus recorded 503 GLs and 1525
WBs in the Indian Himalayan Region across India, Bhutan, Nepal, China and
Myanmar through which the rivers flowing into India are feed.
This
inventory list of 503 GLs and 1525 WBs of the Brahmaputra, Ganga and Indus
Basins were prepared measuring their length, breath and area with the respective elevations coding them
with all individual Lake IDs and UIDs,
also it is found that 50% of these GLs and WBs were located within the
elevation of 4000m to 5000m. Thus the
GLs in Sikkim were coded in the series of (SK) series The South Lhonak
GL Lake ID cum UID no. SK-20/
03-78A-014, but now coded with new UID/ID (07478A010059) as shown if figure 2.
Similarly, the 42 GLs in Sikkim have been re-coded with the twelve digit
numbers as of now as shown in table figure 2.
Figure:3
In
the year 2015, 16 GLs and WBs having more than 50 hectares were prioritize for study taking considering
their locations and vulnerability to the human settlements and hydro projects
downstream and thus five GLs including the South Lhonak Lake, situated in Sikkim where amongst the short listed for study, on top priority. Thus in the year 2015, an advisory sheet, “
Glacial Lake Outburst Flood-South Lhonak System in Teesta River Basin”, was
prepared by the government of India focusing on the South Lhonak Lake and the
three other GLs located above it, namely, which where the other tributaries of
the Teesta as these GLs were considered to be the critical lakes, hence found
necessary to analyze and study the impact of an imminent GLOF to all the human
settlements of Lachen, Chungthang, Mangan, Dikchu, Singtam, Manipal Mazitar and
Rangpo and the Hydro Power Projects, Teesta stage I, II, III IV, V and Teesta
Low Dam
III and IV at Bara Munga in West Bengal
all located downstream, which
stood to be vulnerable in case of the
outburst of these GLs.
The
maximum size of the water spread area of the South Lhonak Lake recorded was 136
(ha) in the month of June 2009. All possible scenarios of
different types of permutations and
combinations of the possible GLs outburst were taken into consideration as also
two of the Lakes were interconnected. Thus the all the worst case scenarios of
only South Lhonak Lake bursting or only other three Lakes bursting
separately lake and any of the two lakes bursting together and finally all four
Lakes bursting together were taken into consideration and thus the hazard modeling and mapping for the South
Lhonak Lake flow path, velocity and preliminary hazard classification along
with event intensity were released accordingly. The study adhered to some
assumptions and limitations, most importantly, that the flow is not modified at
the hydro power projects downstream, went completely wrong as the Teesta stage
III at Chungthang and Teesta stage V at
Dikchu totally collapsed due to the impact of the GLOF on the fateful night of
3rd and 4th October 2023.
Secondly,
that the flow of the river assumed at 1000 meter cube per second too changed
abruptly as the voluminous water stored by the Dams too added to the increased
flow downstream when the Dams collapsed, causing maximum damage as 1423 houses were completely damaged 579
houses were partially damaged leaving 102 people dead and 76 missing effecting
the lives of 88,400 of the population of Sikkim and also that of West Bengal
too as the Teesta covers a flow length of 150 km within Sikkim and 123 km in West Bengal and another 140 km in
Bangladesh, till it merges into the Bay of Bengal. The Teesta river course
intercepted by now, the damaged Teesta stage III Dam (Sikkim Urja Ltd.) at
Chungthang, the Teesta V Dam at Dikchu and the Teesta VI Barrage at Sirwani,
Singtam followed by two Lower Dams and
Gojaldoba Barrage, all three projects, within West Bengal as shown in
figure 1.
All
these catastrophic flash flood death and destruction happened only when the limited scenario of the single GL,
the South Lhonak lake bursting but
still believed to be one of the worst
climate related disasters as reported by ‘The State of the Climate Asia 2023’
as the spread area of the South Lhonak
lake reduced drastically from 171
hectares as on 23rd of September 2023 to 130 hectares on October 5th 2023. But surprisingly, the data set of the
South Lhonak Lake shows that there was a similar voluminous discharge from the Lake in the year 2016-17,
when the Lake recorded water spread area of 128 hectares in August 2016 which
suddenly dropped to 99 hectares on September 2016, but no flash flood of any
destructive magnitude has been observed. As of date the South Lhonak Lake has
again refilled to 136 hectares size again and continuous to be in the very high
risk level. Further tracking the water spread area of South Lhonak Lake, it
increased by 65.96% in June 2019 when it expanded to 156 hectares and an
advisory of the lake requiring continuous monitoring was issued.
Again
reference to figure 1 and 2 above, clearly Sikkim is facing very potent and
imminent threat from these 42 Glacial Lakes, which are the ticking water bombs
ready to explode nestled high up in the Indian Himalayan Region, worst still,
its information and progressive report is not privy to public at large. As per
the Geological Survey of India, there are
9,575 glaciers in the IHR and Sikkim is home to 320 glaciers. As is evident that the glaciers around the
world have started to melt at an alarming rate now primarily because of human
lifestyle and industrial pollution increase
in emission of greenhouse gases with rapid increase of temperatures and thus
the resultant global warming and climate change. Sikkim too records that there
is a gradual rise of temperature at the rate of 0.2 to 0.3 degree centigrade
per decade with unseasonal heavy rainfall and much warmer and drier winters too.
Thus
the glacial melt will not only pose the
threat of GLOFs but will ultimately change the weather pattern, impacting
industrial output socio-economic
condition and agriculture pattern in
Sikkim. All the 42 GLs out flow discharge are the tributaries of the
river Teesta and hence before we resume our livelihood and economic and
industrial settlement along the Teesta basin yet again, firstly the carrying
capacity of the Teesta basin has to be
reassessed and re-visit the report approved by the MoEFCC, GoI in 2007, for any planned and sustainable future for Sikkim.
Secondly,
already the National Disaster Management Plan 2019, has categorized the Indian
Himalayan Region including the North-East region, with its peculiar topography,
geology, climate and environment along socio-cultural tradition as a priority
sector requiring specific disaster mitigation and containments plans. The Disaster
Management Plan 2019, has listed GLOFs as a hazard and a disaster under natural calamity and worst still, within the
Sikkim Himalayan Region many GLs are still in the process of formation. The mitigation, management and containment of
any disaster requires a well coordinated
multi level inter-ministerial and inter-agency from local to Centre level to
establish the required network in the hour of crisis.
Thus
the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) has laid down specific
guidelines for the management of GLOFs with a shared responsibilities between
the concerned state and the Centre. In understanding the risk of GLOFs, the
role of the State is to involve the local communities in monitoring the GLs and
WBs and data collection and most importantly to install the appropriate warning
system, mapping the unsafe areas and settlements, amalgamate the indigenous
knowledge and hazard zonation. While the Centre, has to provide the technical
support, monitoring, research along with understanding the GLOF risk in
relation to the people and property located downstream and the Dam break modelling
and downstream vulnerability assessment.
Above
all, the Centre has manage the effective coordination and seamless
communication between the central and the state agencies to ensure quick,
clear, effective dissemination of warnings, information and data and the State
is tasked with the all important responsibility of preparation and
implementation of the disaster management
plans with State specific strategies and make legal provisions mandating
infrastructure developers, especially private hydropower developers to engage
in GLOF early warning and risk reduction activities. Also the State is tasked
with the responsibility of amending town and city plans to reduce risks,
enhance the capacities of Panchayat Raj Institutions and local communities at
risk to monitor and prepare for the likelihood of GLOF. But all these are only
in the rule book as usual.
Nevertheless, post the Sikkim disaster, the Centre
government on the 20th of November 2023 has constituted a high level
committee to examine the effect of GLOFs in Teesta River projects and Sikkim
disaster, headed by Sh. R.K. Jain, Ex-Chairman , CWC along with nine other
members as per the clause(8) of schedule II of the Dam Safety Act, 2021, with
reference to some important Terms of Reference as (1) to examine the causes
leading to the bursting of south Lhonak Glacial lake and consequent failure of
Teesta-III dam and damages to other downstream dams and interact with the dam
owners/agencies on the same point of reference (2) To examine the status of the
Early Warning System installed by the dam owners in Teesta basin and its
performance during the GLOF disaster (3) to
review the status of the Glacial lakes, including the frequency of monitoring
and responsibility of the dam owners (4) To review the action taken by Sikkim
state and dam owners following the issuance of CWC advisory on GLOF in 2015 to
the Sikkim state (5) To review the reservoir
and gate operations carried out by the dam authorities during the heavy
discharge release.(6)To recommend measures to prevent/minimize the recurrence
of such events in future.
The
committee was to submit its report within two months. Parallelly, the Sikkim
govt. too on the 11th of September constituted one High Level Steering Committee
(HLSC) headed by the Chief Secretary along with the DGP, Sikkim Police and
eight others as members with the Terms of Reference as to coordinate with the
defense establishments, paramilitary forces and the Central Government agencies
to provide support, to partner with leading experts and organizations , to
evaluate various mitigation options and approve the glacial flood mitigation
plans and to suggest possible funding source
to support the glacial floods mitigation plans. The HLSC was to meet at
least once in six months. The HLSC was followed by another formation of Multi-disciplinary
Task Force (MTF), headed by the Secretary, Science and Technology Department
and nine other members. The terms of Reference of the MTF was to contribute to
the expeditions to the high risk Glacial lakes, prepare mitigation plans for
the same, invite subject experts, regularly update the HLSC on progress made and future plans. The MTF
was to hold meeting at least once in a month.
The
Centre has on the 25th of July 2024 approved Rs 150 crore under The
National Glacial Lake Outburst Floods Risk Mitigation Programme to mitigate the risks from the 189 high risk
GLs and WBs in the states of Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Sikkim and
Arunachal Pradesh and on the 1st
of August 2024, The Disaster Management( Amendment) Bill 2024 was introduced in
the Lok Sabha on the to strengthen the
working of the National Disaster Management Authority and the State Disaster
Management Authorities to prepare national and state level plans along with disaster data base focusing on
disaster risk reduction, especially in managing the climate induced disasters.
The Bill further incorporates the Urban Disaster Management Authorities to look
into the city level disasters for the state capitals and cities that have
municipal corporations, all these amending
the two decade old The Disaster
Management Act 2005 on the backdrop of India facing multiple calamities
especially climate induced resulting in droughts, cloudbursts causing landslides and flash floods, cyclones, heatwaves the accelerated melting of the glaciers and thus
leading to GLOF and outburst of other WBs formed in the IHR causing massive erosion with increased
flooding engulfing everything on its way
downstream causing unprecedented damages to live and properties as witnessed in
Sikkim on the 3rd and 4th of October 2023.
Sikkim
at present, though our Air Quality Index (AQI) in all the eight station from
Rangpo to Chungthang records good to satisfactory and the Water Quality across the 30 stations
are within the permissible safe limits, the State is facing the brunt of the
effects of climate change and global warming which is here to stay.
Nevertheless the State is well equipped with its own specialize, “Sikkim State
Climate Change Cell”, established in 2014 under the National Mission for
Sustaining the Himalayan Eco-system under National Action plan on Climate Change, additionally
supplemented with the “Sikkim State Remote Sensing Centre” which was engaged in
monitoring of the South Lhonak Lake too. Also, the Centre has approved the
“Mission Mausam” with an outlay of Rs 2000 crores over the next two years to
boost India’s capacity to forecast and mitigate extreme weather events and the
impacts of climate change with the deployment of state of the art radars and
satellite system and automated real time data sharing technology.
So
with all the multi layered Centre-State
(GLOF) disaster management plans supported by specialized expert committee
groups at different levels funded by special mission resources, and regular
expedition carried out by the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation,
Sikkim State Disaster Management Authority, National Disaster Management
Authority teams and the concerned line department of the government of Sikkim,
we only hope that the imminent danger and hazard posed by these 42 Glacial
Lakes and other Water Bodies nestled in the Sikkim Himalayan Region, the
ticking water bombs, can be mitigated and contained to ensure that Sikkim and
the downstream areas remains disaster resilient and safe least similar
catastrophic and tragic events of the 3rd and 4th of
October 2023 doesn’t repeat yet again.
(Views
are personal. Email: mksubba@gmail.com)